Multi-Service Cultural Centre Le Foirail
Betillon & Freyermuth*, Crypto Architectes. Laguiole, France
-
Name of work in English
Multi-Service Cultural Centre Le Foirail
-
Name of work in original language
Le Forail Pôle Multiservices de Laguiole
Prize year
EUmies Awards 2026
-
Work Location
Laguiole, France
-
Studio
Betillon & Freyermuth*, Crypto Architectes
EUmies Awards 2026 Emerging finalists
Collaborators
Program
Mixed use - Cultural & Social
-
Labels
Compact · Children & Youth · Library · Music · Civic Centre
Site area
2600 m²
-
Client
Communauté de communes Aubrac, Carladez et Viadène
Total gross floor
1265 m²
Cost
1675 €/m²
For this project on Foirail Square in Laguiole, we proposed a radical hall to host a complex programme, expressly avoiding regionalist pastiche. The Aubrac, Carladez and Viadène community joined forces to deliver an ambitious facility merging a music school, media library, micro-crèche and offices. Conceived as a mutable “machine-building”, it can reconfigure and grow over time. Building in a rural context demands modesty and commitment: we aimed to create a rooted, open, unifying public space, a catalyst for shared life and local dynamism, supporting culture, care and everyday encounters now.
Laguiole is a territory apart. Located in a remote rural France, without infrastructures and far from metropolitan dynamics, yet marked by a strong identity. Its high-altitude landscape, harsh climate and deeply rooted agricultural culture have shaped a land of pride, a terroir that embraces its singularity and claims rurality as a strength. Laguiole is also a two-Michelin-star restaurant, a world-renowned knife-making tradition, a community that knows how to do a lot with almost nothing. Like many small French rural communes, it faces limited resources. To build a public facility, several municipalities must join forces, pooling budgets through complex administrative structures. The project leadership lies in the hands of volunteers, civic figures investing their time and energy to create a shared place. In the competition, we refused the clichés of pastoral charm or rural nostalgia. We answered with the same precision and radicality we would bring to a metropolitan context, without folklore, without romanticising the countryside. That exact stance was acknowledged and valued.
Today, it has become difficult for an architect to adopt the stance of a builder. For us, new construction is an exceptional, almost ultimate act, and we favour transformation whenever possible. Our position could be summed up as: “building can wait.” We can no longer extract materials endlessly from the earth, it can’t sustain that any longer. This project was therefore conceived using local resources, the timber comes from just a few kilometres away, but above all as a reversible structure, imagined like a giant modular system where each element can be separated, dismantled, moved. It is neither utopian nor theoretical to imagine the building being entirely disassembled one day and rebuilt elsewhere: it was designed for that. Meanwhile, its clear grid and simple, rigorous form allow it to host new uses, evolve, extend with ease. Continuing its structure would be an almost natural act, as if the building already contained its own continuation.